|
THE Lectures contained in this Volume
were delivered on Sunday afternoons in St. James's Chapel, during
the season of 1872. Others, on Blake, Shelley, Keats and Byron,
delivered in 1873, will be published, I hope, before the close
of this year. The thing was an experiment. I began it in May 1871,
when I asked the Rev. J. M. Capes to deliver a course of lectures
for me, which should not take the form of sermons, but, on the
contrary, should avoid it. He chose as his subject the Inner Life
of the Romish Church, and afterwards the Relation of Music to
Religion. When he had finished his lectures on these subjects,
which were as well attended as they eminently deserved to be,
I began another course on Theology in the English Poets, which
I have continued to the present time. Since I began to carry out
the experiment in 1871, the lectures on week-days in St. Paul's
have been established, and in St. James's Church, Piccadilly,
discourses have been preached on a few Sunday afternoons on such
subjects as the Drama and the Press, by eminent clergymen. I believe
if a similar effort could be made in many of the London churches
in the Sunday afternoons, that much good might be done. It would
give variety to clerical work on Sunday, and much knowledge that
now remains only as latent force among the clergy might be made
dynamic, if I may borrow a term from science. If rectors of large
churches would ask clergymen who know any subject of the day well
to lecture on its religious aspect in the afternoon, and give
them half the offertory, if needful, for their trouble, they
would please themselves, enlighten their congregations, and fill
their churches. And they would assist the cause of religion among
that large number of persons who do not go to church, and who
think that Christianity has nothing to do with Politics, Art,
Literature or Science.
When I made this experiment, I had long desired to bring the pulpit
on Sunday to bear on subjects other than those commonly called
religious, and to rub out the sharp lines drawn by that false
distinction of sacred and profane. If what I believed were true,
and God in Christ had sanctified all human life; if every sphere
of Man's thought and action was in idea, and ought to be in fact,
a channel through which God thought and God acted - then there
was no subject which did not in the end run up into Theology,
which might not in the end be made religious. I wished then to
claim as belonging to the province of the Christian ministry,
political, historical, scientific, and artistic work, in their
connexion with Theology; and to an extent greater than I had hoped
for, the effort, so far as I have carried it, has succeeded. The
blame of many accustomed to hear nothing but sermons from the
pulpit has been wholly outweighed in my mind by the fact of the
attendance of many persons who were before uninterested in religious
subjects at all. And then, neither the blame nor the praise of
the present is any proof of the goodness or badness of a thing.
The Poets themselves formed the only text book I have used, but
in the two first lectures, when treating of the growth of the
Poetry of Man and of Nature, I have had much help from an admirable
Essay of Mr. F. Palgrave's, which appeared in the "Quarterly
Review" of July, 1862.
STOPFORD A. BROOKE
MANCHESTER SQUARE,
LONDON,
April, 1874 .
|
|